EIC Stage 1
Three qualitative verdicts, short-application readiness, proposal–deck consistency and ranked repairs.
View Stage 1 report →Upload a Horizon Europe, EIC Accelerator, Eurostars or Innowwide proposal. GrantWise returns a simulated, criteria-aligned assessment with traceable evidence, a confidence label and a ranked revision plan. It supports professional judgement; it does not predict the official decision.
Your proposal and the call you're applying to. EIC Stage 1 includes its pitch deck; Stage 2 includes the complete assessment dossier. No account needed.
Every score is tied to graded findings, proposal locations and the applicable programme or uploaded call material.
Your free score preview arrives by email. Unlock the complete report only if it is useful to you. Your proposal is deleted.
ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are useful general tools. GrantWise is a repeatable proposal-review workflow built around the selected funding programme and your actual dossier.
The selected programme loads its own evaluator method, drafting guidance, eligibility signals, criteria, thresholds and document requirements instead of relying on a prompt you must design.
Where relevant, the proposal is reconciled with its workplan, pitch deck, budget, annexes and uploaded call material so contradictions surface across documents.
Every graded finding needs a proposal location, evidence basis, applicable requirement, concrete correction and a condition for passing re-review.
Deterministic preflight, findings-derived scoring and a separate challenge pass for unusually favourable results reduce flattering but unsupported conclusions.
You receive ranked priorities, model-answer patterns, a shareable PDF and revision comparison—not just a disposable chat response.
This is not a claim that the underlying model is “five times smarter.” It is five specialist quality-control layers designed for proposal review that a single general-purpose prompt normally does not provide.
These are shortened structural previews. They show how the actual review is organised, scored and written. A paid report is substantially longer and more detailed, with more findings, criterion analysis, evidence tracing and proposal-specific corrections. All examples use fictional applicants and contain no customer data.
Three qualitative verdicts, short-application readiness, proposal–deck consistency and ranked repairs.
View Stage 1 report →Full-dossier ledger, evidence-depth verdicts, funding logic, annex consistency and dossier repairs.
View Stage 2 report →Native 1–6 scoring, the 3.6 criterion thresholds, eligibility signals and time-to-market judgement.
View Eurostars report →Native 30/40/30 scoring, market-entry experiment map, workplan reconciliation and execution readiness.
View Innowwide report →One upload. A format-faithful evaluation and a ranked list of fixes, sent to your inbox.
PAYMENT CONFIRMED
We have sent your report by email. It can take a minute to arrive.
Start with the free preview. Pay only when the full evidence-led review is useful.
Founding-customer pricing
€69: EIC Stage 1 or Innowwide · €99: EIC Stage 2, Horizon Europe or Eurostars
Already quality-controlled: deterministic document preflight, programme-specific review contracts, evidence traceability, findings-derived scoring, a complete Horizon scorecard and a challenge pass for unusually favourable results.
Not yet claimed: GrantWise has not published a statistically sufficient benchmark against official ESRs. Until that study is complete, results are labelled as simulated assessments—not funding predictions.
Read the methodology and benchmark plan → · Explore all four synthetic reports →
Your work is confidential and time-critical. The service is built around both.
Your file is parsed in memory and never written to disk or a database. We keep only the generated report for up to 7 days so you can choose whether to unlock it.
Evaluation runs on EU-region infrastructure (europe-west1). Your text is never used to train any model.
EIC, Eurostars and Innowwide load their own programme-specific review methods. Horizon lets you add the Call ID, topic or official call material; without it, the report clearly states that it is programme-level.
A programme-specific simulated assessment, evidence-backed findings, ranked corrections, model-answer patterns and a shareable PDF. EIC uses qualitative verdicts rather than invented numerical scores. Eurostars uses its native 1–6 structure and criterion thresholds. Innowwide uses its native 30/40/30 structure and reconciles the application with the mandatory workplan.
A general AI can be useful, but the result depends heavily on the prompt and context you construct. GrantWise applies a repeatable five-layer workflow: the correct programme contract, whole-dossier reconciliation, traceable evidence, conservative scoring and a revision-ready deliverable. It is not a claim that the underlying model is five times smarter; the advantage is the controlled review process around it.
The form changes automatically. EIC Stage 1 shows the short proposal and optional pitch deck. Stage 2 shows the full proposal and optional evidence annexes. Eurostars asks only for the application. Innowwide asks for the application and mandatory workplan. Horizon additionally offers Call ID, topic and official call material. Video pitches are never uploaded or assessed.
Yes. View the four synthetic EIC Stage 1, EIC Stage 2, Eurostars and Innowwide reports above. These are intentionally shortened previews that show the structure, scoring language and style of corrections. Actual paid reports are substantially longer and more detailed. The samples use fictional applicants, contain no customer data and are not presented as proof of benchmark accuracy.
The engine derives results conservatively from graded findings and the programme's own review contract. Confidence depends on evidence traceability and grounding. The result remains a simulated estimate and should be combined with qualified human review for eligibility, legal, financial and scientific claims.
Typically 2–5 minutes. You can close the page after submitting—your free score preview arrives by email.
No. It is an independent pre-submission simulation designed to surface gaps before submission. It is not an assessment by the European Commission, EIC or Eureka and does not predict a funding decision.
Yes. Fix the top corrections and upload the revised version. Comparing the reports shows which issues resolved, persisted, worsened or appeared in the new version.
The score preview and two priority fixes are free. The completed report is €69 for EIC Stage 1 or Innowwide and €99 for EIC Stage 2, Eurostars or Horizon Europe during the founding-customer phase. There is no account and no subscription. If a paid report is materially incomplete, contact us so we can correct it or refund it.
GrantWise is operated by Zaydam Partners LLC, organisation number 7521908, at 539 W. Commerce St #4918, Dallas, TX 75208, United States. The responsible person is Samina Shams. Full provider details appear in the Legal Notice and Terms of Service.