Short-application assessment
Qualitative verdicts for Excellence, Impact, and Risk/Implementation/Need; pitch-deck consistency; and three highest-impact repairs.
Inspect the deliverable before you upload
Each sample follows a different programme review contract. The applicants, evidence and findings are fictional. These shortened previews show the structure, reasoning style and type of corrective advice in the actual deliverable.
The actual paid reports are substantially longer and more detailed. These samples intentionally show only enough content to demonstrate how the review is structured and how the full report will look. A real report contains more findings, criterion analysis, evidence tracing, consistency checks and proposal-specific corrections. The samples are not testimonials, official evaluations or evidence of benchmark accuracy.
Full-dossier assessment
Document ledger, evidence-depth verdicts, funding-counterfactual test, annex reconciliation and exact dossier repairs.
Collaborative R&D assessment
Eligibility signals, native 1–6 criterion scoring, 3.6 thresholds, consortium logic and time-to-market realism.
Market-feasibility assessment
Native 30/40/30 scoring, independent thresholds, experiment map, workplan consistency and execution readiness.
Ready to test your own proposal?
Receive the score preview and two priority fixes free. Decide whether to unlock only after seeing them.
Get my free score preview →