Our review engine runs on the programmes' own published rules — thresholds, templates, readiness scales, annex conditions. We keep them current because we have to. These tools put the same rules in your hands, for free, whether or not you ever buy a review.
GrantWise › Free tools
Five questions about what you have built, tested and can prove. You get your technology and business readiness — worked out from evidence, not picked off a ladder — and the schemes that fit where you are now.
Filter by the scheme you are applying to. Cross-programme tools appear under every scheme they apply to.
Proposal rejected? Send the evaluation report and the proposal it evaluated. Every evaluator comment explained, traced to your proposal and turned into the five changes for your resubmission. Free with a newsletter subscription.
Get my evaluation insight →Answer what you have actually built, how you tested it, what results you got and what evidence you hold — then we derive your technology and business readiness levels rather than asking you to guess them.
Assess my readiness →Five questions — stage, funding form, topic, clinical study — and you get the exact annex list for your case: page caps, formats, which templates you upload blank, and the traps in the official files.
Check my annexes →How far Innovasjonskontrakt, SkatteFUNN, Forskningsrådet grants, EU funding, pilot-customer money and an innovasjonslån can legally be combined — and where the one ceiling that governs all of them actually bites.
Stack my funding →Turn an early-stage EU proposal draft into a complete PES prosjektbeskrivelse for the Research Council, following the official template. Fills what you have, flags what is still missing, and gives you a finished PDF.
Build my PES description →Check your consortium budget live against the four numeric eligibility rules — including the 70% country cap that sums all partners in one country — and see the national step each partner must complete with their own funding body after the central submission.
Check my consortium budget →Sixteen workshop canvases and a facilitator guide to build your impact pathway with the consortium — problem statement, two-way stakeholder engagement, outputs, outcomes and impacts, the problem-to-impact bridge, KPIs and monitoring — and check it the way an evaluator reads it. Free with a newsletter subscription.
Get the toolkit →Every free tool here checks something structural. None of them read your argument. Upload your application and get an independent, criteria-aligned review in 5–8 minutes — every finding names where it sits in your text, which criterion it damages and how to fix it. The tools on this page are free; the full review is paid, and you pay once before it runs.
Each tool is compiled from the funder's own published material — templates, work programmes, application forms, readiness scales — and carries the version stamp of the source it was built from. Where a tool and your live call disagree, your call wins: programme documents change more often than tools do, and we would rather tell you that than pretend otherwise.
None of these tools reads your proposal, and none of them sends anything anywhere unless you explicitly ask for a copy by email. GrantWise is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission, the European Innovation Council, Eureka, Innovasjon Norge, Forskningsrådet or any other funding authority.