| Topic | HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-05 |
|---|---|
| Status | Forthcoming |
| Call | HORIZON-MISS-2027-03 — Supporting the implementation of the Restore our Ocean and Waters Mission |
| Type of action | Innovation Actions |
| Opening | 9 February 2027 |
| Deadline | 21 September 2027 |
| Budget | EUR 3.5 million to EUR 3.98 million per project · 4 projects expected · EUR 15.9 million in total |
| Part B page limit | 40 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:”
- EO1 Increased area and improved condition of marine and coastal vegetated habitats within EU waters through effective on-site conservation, restoration and management of activities to help deliver on the objectives of the Nature Restoration Regulation.
- EO2 Maintained and enhanced capacity of blue carbon ecosystems to naturally store carbon, supporting EU climate mitigation goals.
- EO3 Enhanced capacity of marine vegetated habitats/blue carbon ecosystems to support biodiversity and fisheries.
- EO4 Established novel financing and incentive mechanisms that support conservation, restoration and management of blue forest ecosystems projects.
- EO5 Raised public awareness and improved community participation in blue forest ecosystems protection, restoration and management activities, ensuring long-term involvement.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO5), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “Projects are required to develop collaborations with EU Member States and Associated Countries national and regional agencies and authorities and policy makers and engage with local communities, researchers and NGOs.”
- “Proposals should target the development and implementation of comprehensive strategies that integrate blue carbon ecosystems into marine biodiversity frameworks, in particular in the implementation of the national restoration plans under the Nature Restoration Regulation.”
- “Proposals are expected to show how their activities and results will help achieve the Mission’s objectives and targets.”
- “Each proposal should address only one basin / Mission “lighthouse”, which should be explicitly stated in the proposal, i.e.: 1.”
- “Activities should be tailored to address regional/sea basin specificities.”
- “Proposals should address all of the following:.”
- “Projects should rely on active restoration (e.g. replanting, re-establishment of habitats, Invasive Alien Species prevention) or passive restoration (e.g. removal of environmental pressures).Conservation Efforts: Enhancing the protection of blue carbon habitats by supporting authorities to establish and effectively manage marine protected areas (MPAs)/ EU Blue Parks, implementing the necessary regulatory measures to enable their effective…”
- “Projects aiming to protect, restore and sustainably manage marine ecosystems should explore and scientifically assess the viability, soundness and integrity of innovative business models and financing mechanisms (e.g. nature credits, carbon removal certification, etc.) for their protection, restoration and management, and assess their potential for sustainable development and resilience of EU coastal communities.”
- “Projects should also ensure the continuity of ecological monitoring beyond project duration, embedding effective restoration efforts into long-term observation networks, such as EMODnet.”
- “Projects should build on the best available actionable knowledge, methods and innovations notably from the results of previous national and EU projects.”
- “Projects should involve or align with organizations that provide cross-national and regional scientific coordination and advice on fisheries and ecosystem-based management, to support participatory monitoring, data harmonization and sustainable and inclusive co-management practices across sea basins.”
- “Competent authorities and other stakeholders participating in the project are encouraged to pool and enhance synergies with other sources of funding (e.g. structural, cohesion funds such as ERDF, or LIFE) for implementing and deploying innovative solutions.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 40 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Innovation action: evaluators expect a plausible path to commercialisation and named first users or customers.
- Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds: “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the 4 different Mission basins[[For the purposes of Mission Ocean and waters, Member States/Associated Countries, are considered to be part of a given sea/river basin if they have a coast/riverbank on the relevant sea/river or contain river basins flowing into the relevant…”
- Legal and financial set-up of the grants: “Beneficiaries will be subject to the following additional obligations regarding open science practices: if projects collect in-situ data and marine observations, beneficiaries must make them openly available through the European Marine Observation and Data network (EMODnet), based on the FAIR (Findable, Accessible,…”
Impact pathway and traps
- The scope expects pilots or demonstration. Name the sites, the partners who run them and what is measured there.
- The topic expects cooperation with other projects or initiatives. Reserve effort and budget for it in the work plan.
- Market uptake is part of the scope. Evaluators look for a credible route to market with named first adopters.
- Policy or regulation is in scope. Name the policy owners you will reach and what you will give them.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
This topic seeks innovative multidisciplinary projects that will advance large-scale demonstration of protection, restoration and management of blue forest ecosystems, focusing on the assessment of ecological interactions, restoration of degraded ecosystems, conservation, and sustainable management within European sea basins. Projects are required to develop collaborations with EU Member States and Associated Countries national and regional agencies and authorities and policy makers and engage with local communities, researchers and NGOs. The direct involvement of relevant authorities and stakeholders in the consortium is strongly encouraged. Proposals should target the development and implementation of comprehensive strategies that integrate blue carbon ecosystems into marine biodiversity frameworks, in particular in the implementation of the national restoration plans under the Nature Restoration Regulation. Proposals are expected to show how their activities and results will help achieve the Mission’s objectives and targets. Each proposal should address only one basin / Mission “lighthouse”, which should be explicitly stated in the proposal, i.e.: 1. Atlantic and Arctic sea basin or 2. Mediterranean Sea basin or 3. Baltic and North Sea basin or 4. Danube River basin (including the Black Sea). Activities should be tailored to address regional/sea basin specificities. The basins / Mission “lighthouses” include the river basins flowing into the respective sea basins. Proposals should address all of the following: Protection and restoration activities: Initiatives aiming to restore ecologically relevant, degraded marine and coastal habitats and species, through improving the condition of vegetated habitats and their re-establishment, in accordance with the requirements of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. Projects should rely on active restoration (e.g. replanting, re-establishment of habitats, Invasive Alien Species prevention) or passive restoration (e.g. removal of environmental pressures).Conservation Efforts: Enhancing the protection of blue carbon habitats by supporting authorities to establish and effectively manage marine protected areas (MPAs)/ EU Blue Parks, implementing the necessary regulatory measures to enable their effective restoration and prevent their degradation. Innovative Financing Mechanisms: Exploring innovative financing mechanisms that combine public and private funding, as well as innovative business models for the conservation, restoration and protection of blue carbon ecosystems. Projects aiming to protect, restore and sustainably manage marine ecosystems should explore and scientifically assess the viability, soundness and integrity of innovative business models and financing mechanisms (e.g. nature credits, carbon removal certification, etc.) for their protection, restoration and management, and assess their potential for sustainable development and resilience of EU coastal communities. Research and Monitoring: Assess the cumulative impact of stressors (including Invasive Alien Species and climate change) on the condition of habitats and species and inform the design of necessary protection and restoration measures, using multi-sensor platforms for the long-term monitoring of habitat conditions and ecosystem health, of the restoration success and of the impacts on ecosystems and the services they provide, including natural carbon sequestration potential. Projects should also ensure the continuity of ecological monitoring beyond project duration, embedding effective restoration efforts into long-term observation networks, such as EMODnet. Community Engagement and Education: Initiatives and actions that promote local community involvement and awareness through educational programs and stakeholders' engagement to ensure upscaling and replication. Projects should build on the best available actionable knowledge, methods and innovations notably from the results of previous national and EU projects. Projects should involve or align with organizations that provide cross-national and regional scientific coordination and advice on fisheries and ecosystem-based management, to support participatory monitoring, data harmonization and sustainable and inclusive co-management practices across sea basins. Competent authorities and other stakeholders participating in the project are encouraged to pool and enhance synergies with other sources of funding (e.g. structural, cohesion funds such as ERDF, or LIFE) for implementing and deploying innovative solutions. Actions plans and roadmaps needed for the replication and up-scale of the solutions should be drawn up by the end and beyond projects' duration. Proposals should establish operational links and cooperate with the relevant Lighthouse CSAs and the Mission Implementation Platform, notably to contribute to tracking progress towards the objectives of the Mission and coordination of all relevant implementation activities in the lighthouse basin. This action aligns with key EU policies and initiatives, including: European Green Deal: Focuses on making the EU's economy sustainable through initiatives directed at marine ecosystem protection; EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Aims to restore marine and coastal habitats, acknowledging their role in carbon capture; EU Nature Restoration Regulation: Aims to restore EU ecosystems, including marine ecosystems, furthering blue carbon strategies; EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change: Emphasises natural carbon sinks’ protection, including coastal ecosystems; EU Global Gateway strategy: Sustainable and trusted connections to tackle the most pressing global challenges, from fighting climate change, to improving health systems, and boosting competitiveness and security of global supply chains; Common fisheries policy (CFP): Supports sustainable fisheries management, benefitting marine biodiversity and blue carbon habitats; Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Seeks Good…
Other topics in HORIZON-MISS-2027-03
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-01 — Increasing riparian and coastal areas resilience to climate change, including…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-02 — Circularity of seafood supply chain
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-03 — Green, circular and resilient harbours
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-04 — Towards community-driven business models: coastal and freshwaters sustainable…
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.