GrantWise
HORIZON EUROPE TOPIC · EU Missions

Circularity of seafood supply chain

HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-02 — the expected outcomes as checkable statements, what evaluators look for in this topic, and the conditions that shape the proposal.

Get the free Part B working draft for this topic ↓

ForthcomingIADeadline 21 September 2027EUR 7.2 million to EUR 7.73 million per project

GrantWise › Horizon Europe topics › HORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-02

TopicHORIZON-MISS-2027-03-OCEAN-02
StatusForthcoming
CallHORIZON-MISS-2027-03 — Supporting the implementation of the Restore our Ocean and Waters Mission
Type of actionInnovation Actions
Opening9 February 2027
Deadline21 September 2027
BudgetEUR 7.2 million to EUR 7.73 million per project · 4 projects expected · EUR 30.9 million in total
Part B page limit40 pages (standard application form; check your call)
TemplateWork Programme 2026–2027 application form

Expected outcomes

Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:”

  1. EO1 Measurable improvements in the competitiveness and increased environmental sustainability of the EU’s fisheries and/or aquaculture sectors by integrating circular economy principles.
  2. EO2 Minimized and better managed waste products derived from fisheries and/or aquaculture sectors as well as improved reutilization and reduction of by-products.
  3. EO3 Reduced existing barriers preventing the implementation and development of circular principles in seafood chains, such as the cost of advanced processing technologies, regulatory hurdles, lack of collaboration across the different seafood supply chain actors or limited market demand and acceptance.
  4. EO4 Measurable socio-economic benefits for local stakeholders and communities involved in the seafood processing chain.

What evaluators will look for in this topic

Expected outcomes

  • Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
  • For each outcome (EO1 to EO4), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
  • Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.

What the scope asks for

Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.

  • “Proposals under this topic are expected to show how activities and results will contribute to achieve Mission objective 2 - prevent and eliminate pollution of marine and freshwaters and Mission objective 3 – Sustainable, carbon-neutral and circular blue economy.”
  • “Proposals under this topic should test and demonstrate the technical feasibility, the economic viability and the effectiveness of innovative solutions that improve the circularity and the sustainability of the seafood chain of aquaculture and/or fisheries sectors.”
  • “These circular solutions should also provide socio-economic benefits to the local communities and stakeholders across the seafood value chain by creating jobs and business opportunities, and enhance skills at local level.”
  • “Proposals should address at least one of the following issues:.”
  • “The effectiveness, feasibility and efficiency of the proposed solutions should be demonstrated in real conditions through, at least, three use cases per project.”
  • “Therefore, projects under this topic should also implement digital tools and predictive models able to monitor pollution and to improve waste management from aquaculture and/or fisheries activities that can measure the effectiveness of the implemented circular solutions in reducing waste.”
  • “Each proposal should address only one basin / Mission “lighthouse”, which should be explicitly stated in the proposal, i.e.: 1.”
  • “Activities should be tailored to address regional/sea basin specificities.”
  • “Proposals should foster cross-sectoral cooperation by involving all relevant stakeholders across the seafood supply chain including producers, processing industries, technology providers and researchers in the co-creation of innovative solutions to increase the competitiveness and sustainability of the seafood industry and generate socio-economic benefits at local level.”
  • “Proposals should take measures for an early involvement of relevant stakeholders in the project.”
  • “The proposed solutions should also show the potential for further scaling up and replication.”
  • “In addition, activities and proposed solutions should be implemented in a way that respect and benefit ecosystems health and biodiversity and that ensure and prioritize the health and welfare of animals.”

Conditions that shape the proposal

  • Part B, sections 1–3: 40 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
  • Innovation action: evaluators expect a plausible path to commercialisation and named first users or customers.
  • Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds: “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the 4 different Mission basins[[For the purposes of Mission Ocean and waters, Member States/Associated Countries, are considered to be part of a given sea/river basin if they have a coast/riverbank on the relevant sea/river or contain river basins flowing into the relevant…”
  • Legal and financial set-up of the grants: “Beneficiaries will be subject to the following additional obligations regarding open science practices: if projects collect in-situ data and marine observations, beneficiaries must make them openly available through the European Marine Observation and Data network (EMODnet), based on the FAIR (Findable, Accessible,…”

Impact pathway and traps

  • Users or citizens are part of the scope. Show how they take part in the design and testing, not only that they are informed.
  • The scope expects pilots or demonstration. Name the sites, the partners who run them and what is measured there.
  • Policy or regulation is in scope. Name the policy owners you will reach and what you will give them.
  • Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
  • Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
  • Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
  • Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published

Proposals under this topic are expected to show how activities and results will contribute to achieve Mission objective 2 - prevent and eliminate pollution of marine and freshwaters and Mission objective 3 – Sustainable, carbon-neutral and circular blue economy. The goal is to improve the competitiveness of the European seafood industry along the value chain while ensuring optimal resource use and minimising environmental impacts by applying circular economy principles to the aquaculture and/or fisheries sectors. In this topic, seafood covers marine or freshwater edible organisms, including seaweeds and algae. Projects under this topic are relevant to the Circular Economy Action Plan, the EU Bioeconomy Strategy, the EU Algae Initiative, the EU Action Plan Towards Zero Pollution, the European Ocean Pact and the Mission objective of making the blue economy sustainable. The circular approach in seafood supply chain can be applied by the reduction and better management of waste products and/or by improving the valorisation of fisheries and aquaculture by-products which can be used as input for other industries. The aquaculture sector can also explore more sustainable and circular practices as following the example of the Integral Multi-tropic Aquaculture (IMTA) or the diversification to lower trophic species. Another example is the use of innovative organic feed from fisheries bycatch, agriculture products or low-trophic species, as alternatives to traditional fish meal and fish oil, which will reduce dependency on wild fish stocks. Proposals under this topic should test and demonstrate the technical feasibility, the economic viability and the effectiveness of innovative solutions that improve the circularity and the sustainability of the seafood chain of aquaculture and/or fisheries sectors. These circular solutions should also provide socio-economic benefits to the local communities and stakeholders across the seafood value chain by creating jobs and business opportunities, and enhance skills at local level. Proposals should address at least one of the following issues: Innovative and efficient methods and techniques for extracting high-value compounds and valorising seafood by-products from discards of unavoidable unwanted catches or waste products (e.g.: fish sludge, fish manure, trimmings, viscera, shells, seaweed and algal residues, etc.). These high-value extracted compounds can be used for different applications, such as animal feed, or as inputs for other industries like, for instance, food production, fertilisers, nutraceuticals, cosmetics, biotech industries, bioplastics and bio-based packaging. Applications in the field of alternative energy sources or pharmaceuticals are excluded under this topic. Innovative organic feed ingredients, as alternatives to fish meal and fish oil, with the potential to support good growth and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) taking into account single species nutritional needs, enabling sustainable future organic aquaculture development in Europe. The effectiveness, feasibility and efficiency of the proposed solutions should be demonstrated in real conditions through, at least, three use cases per project. The monitoring and quantifying of waste products from aquaculture and fisheries are also relevant to improve the circularity of those sectors. Therefore, projects under this topic should also implement digital tools and predictive models able to monitor pollution and to improve waste management from aquaculture and/or fisheries activities that can measure the effectiveness of the implemented circular solutions in reducing waste. Each proposal should address only one basin / Mission “lighthouse”, which should be explicitly stated in the proposal, i.e.: 1. Atlantic and Arctic sea basin or 2. Mediterranean Sea basin or 3. Baltic and North Sea basin or 4. Danube River basin (including the Black Sea). Activities should be tailored to address regional/sea basin specificities. Proposals should foster cross-sectoral cooperation by involving all relevant stakeholders across the seafood supply chain including producers, processing industries, technology providers and researchers in the co-creation of innovative solutions to increase the competitiveness and sustainability of the seafood industry and generate socio-economic benefits at local level. Proposals should take measures for an early involvement of relevant stakeholders in the project. The proposed solutions should also show the potential for further scaling up and replication. In addition, activities and proposed solutions should be implemented in a way that respect and benefit ecosystems health and biodiversity and that ensure and prioritize the health and welfare of animals. The innovative solutions should respect principles and objectives of the Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 EU organic aquaculture regulation. Projects should consider the results of relevant projects implemented under EMFAF, Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe and cooperate and exchange as appropriate with them. Projects are also expected to cooperate and exchange with projects funded under the topic HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-CIRCBIO-11: “Increasing the circularity of bio-based sector: upcycling and recycling for higher value and environmental benefits” as well as with activities under the Circular Biobased Europe (CBE) Joint Undertaking and the Sustainable Blue Econom y partnership. Proposals are encouraged to consider, when relevant, the services offered by European Research Infrastructures as well as relevant Research Infrastructure projects in the field of fisheries and aquaculture such as AQUASERV. Proposals should establish operational links and cooperate with the relevant Lighthouse CSAs and the Mission Implementation Platform, notably to contribute to tracking progress towards…

Other topics in HORIZON-MISS-2027-03

Source and attribution

Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.