| Topic | HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-16 |
|---|---|
| Status | Forthcoming |
| Call | HORIZON-CL5-2027-03 — MOBILITY |
| Type of action | Innovation Actions · lump sum |
| Opening | 15 December 2026 |
| Deadline | 14 April 2027 |
| Budget | around EUR 7.5 million per project · 2 projects expected · EUR 15 million in total |
| TRL at the end | TRL 7 |
| Part B page limit | 45 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Project outputs and results are expected to contribute to all the following expected outcomes:”
- EO1 Demonstration of remote-control operation of vessels without crew, controlled remotely (degree three).
- EO2 Development of concepts for fully autonomous ship where the operating system on the vessel is able to make decisions and determine actions by itself (degree four).
- EO3 Strengthen market confidence in the integration of remote and automated navigation in ship types and services that may see a shortage of workforce in the next decade.
- EO4 Contribute to the EU Port Strategy and the EU Industrial Waterborne Strategy, as well as the EU AI Continent Action Plan and the upcoming EU Apply AI Strategy.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO4), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “Projects are expected to address all the following aspects:.”
- “The demonstration should be performed in at least one short-sea shipping vessel.”
- “Demonstrations and concept studies should address the whole navigation voyage, including port calling, mooring, and berthing, potential offshore charging solutions, and passing through locks in all weather conditions.”
- “Demonstrations should also include aspects for predictive maintenance, self-diagnostic systems to ensure optimal functioning of the vessel’s equipment and structure.”
- “Projects should exceed outcomes of previous or on-going projects in relevant ship types.”
- “Proposals are expected to explain the contribution of their objectives, results, IP management and exploitation strategy to the EU added value creation and strategic autonomy throughout the supply and value chain, including competitiveness of the EU waterborne industry, enhancement of the EU’s R&I capacity, technological know-how capabilities and human capital, and resilience of the EU industrial and manufacturing base.”
- “Proposals are encouraged to prioritise shipyards, equipment manufacturers and providers located and/or manufacturing in the EU and EEA.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 45 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Lump sum: the budget is fixed per work package and paid when each work package is completed. Every work package needs activities and deliverables an evaluator can verify, and the effort must match the money.
- TRL: the topic expects TRL 7 by the end of the project. State where you start and the evidence for it.
- Innovation action: evaluators expect a plausible path to commercialisation and named first users or customers.
Impact pathway and traps
- The scope expects pilots or demonstration. Name the sites, the partners who run them and what is measured there.
- Standardisation is mentioned. Name the committees or bodies and the partner who engages with them.
- Policy or regulation is in scope. Name the policy owners you will reach and what you will give them.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) have been the focus for several projects both with EU-funding and individual countries but a major breakthrough leading to extensive deployment and widespread commercial maturity are still not achieved. Autonomous vessels can offer safer and more efficient operations and cost savings. New skills and training needed for MASS is a critical issue to ensure safe operations. Projects are expected to address all the following aspects: Demonstration of two different remotely controlled vessels without seafarers on board, considering the most promising areas of operation and types of ships towards market adoption. The demonstration should be performed in at least one short-sea shipping vessel. Demonstration of two different fully autonomous operation in at least one inland waterway vessel. Demonstrations and concept studies should address the whole navigation voyage, including port calling, mooring, and berthing, potential offshore charging solutions, and passing through locks in all weather conditions. Demonstrations should also include aspects for predictive maintenance, self-diagnostic systems to ensure optimal functioning of the vessel’s equipment and structure Identify and address implementation bottlenecks for relevant ship types, such as data quality and lack of infrastructure related to waterborne transport. Map infrastructure and investment needs for extensive roll-out for automated ships operations Appropriate steps to ensure sufficient cyber risk management of the systems and infrastructure used when conducting trials. Address standardization needs and possible safeguards to secure data-integrity and cyber security. Provide recommendations to the relevant regulatory bodies. Address the risk of unlawful data transfer to third-countries outside the borders of the EU/EEA and the impacts it could have on EU fleets. Integrate ongoing legal processes at EU level and at the IMO related to inland automated vessels and MASS i.e., MASS Code, Search&Rescue and Remote Operating Centres. Address safety considerations (using EMSA’s Risk Based Assessment Methodology) and upskilling of port and vessel operators. Assess the net carbon impact of autonomous vessels, taking into account the devices and data processing needed to operate them and potential emissions saved, and ensure no significant harm to biodiversity. If applicable, the calculation method to assess the net impact of digital solutions from the European Green Digital Coalition (EGDC) could be used. Projects should exceed outcomes of previous or on-going projects in relevant ship types. Model the economic viability of the developed solutions, considering initial investment, operational savings, maintenance costs, and potential financial incentives, to assess the economic feasibility while also facilitating decision-making in the design process. All while considering the societal aspects of future shortening workforce. Proposals are expected to explain the contribution of their objectives, results, IP management and exploitation strategy to the EU added value creation and strategic autonomy throughout the supply and value chain, including competitiveness of the EU waterborne industry, enhancement of the EU’s R&I capacity, technological know-how capabilities and human capital, and resilience of the EU industrial and manufacturing base. Proposals are encouraged to prioritise shipyards, equipment manufacturers and providers located and/or manufacturing in the EU and EEA.
Technology readiness, as published
Activities are expected to achieve TRL 7 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL. 100th session of IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 100): Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board: The ship is controlled and operated from another location. There are no seafarers on board. For inland navigation purposes, the demonstration should allow for…
Other topics in HORIZON-CL5-2027-03
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-03 — Data-driven circular economy for e-mobility ecosystem (2ZERO Partnership)
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-04 — Demonstration of zero emission coaches and buses in long distance operations…
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-05 — Higher Voltage, Megawatt Charging System compatible, modular powertrain for…
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-06 — Fire prevention and mitigation for EVs in confined areas (2ZERO Partnership)
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-08 — Sustainable aircraft circular design and additive manufacturing, towards a…
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-14 — Onboard renewable energy solutions and energy saving measures to reduce the…
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-15 — Prospective evaluation of nuclear power potential for shipping (ZEWT…
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-17 — Innovative Solutions for mitigating the environmental impact of waterborne…
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-18 — Enhanced electric operation and battery durability (ZEWT Partnership)
- HORIZON-CL5-2027-03-D5-20 — Assessing the effect of airport operations on air quality and noise in nearby…
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.