| Topic | HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-03 |
|---|---|
| Status | Forthcoming |
| Call | HORIZON-MISS-2027-02 — Supporting the implementation of the Cancer Mission |
| Type of action | Research and Innovation Actions · lump sum |
| Opening | 10 February 2027 |
| Deadline | 16 September 2027 |
| Budget | EUR 7 million to EUR 9 million per project · 3 projects expected · EUR 24 million in total |
| Part B page limit | 45 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Proposals under this topic should aim to deliver results that are directed and tailored towards, and contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:”
- EO1 Patients with rare or very rare cancers or cancer subtypes have access to tailored, promising biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions via participation in subsequent clinical trials or national or regional compassionate use programmes by health authorities.
- EO2 Researchers, physicians, innovators, startup, spin-off and spin-out companies, SMEs, charities or foundations and other professionals from different disciplines and sectors have access to innovative technology, medical devices or promising biomarker-guided medicines for further validation or commercialisation.
- EO3 National healthcare providers, policymakers and authorities in European regions, EU Member States and Associated Countries have early safety and efficacy evidence to support further testing of affordable biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions that benefit patients with rare or very rare cancers in their healthcare systems.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO3), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “Proposals should address all the following:.”
- “Drug repurposing should be considered.”
- “Data should be disaggregated by tumour biology, sex, gender, age and other relevant variables, such as by measures of socio-economic status or ethnicity.”
- “The primary and secondary endpoints of the clinical trial(s) should support safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes.”
- “Such endpoints should be defined together with patients and their caregivers through research that stimulates social innovation and supports end-user engagement using participative research models.”
- “All datasets produced should be described with metadata records in the EU dataset catalogue of the European Health Data Space, while all tools and models should take advantage of current European research infrastructures, should follow the principles of open science and made available through the future UNCAN.eu platform.”
- “Applicants should include proof of advice from regulators on the design of the clinical trial(s), include an appropriate mix of stakeholders from various disciplines, and regional as well as national health authorities, and provide details of the clinical study(ies) in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system.”
- “Successful proposals will be asked to join the 'Diagnosis and treatment” cluster for the EU Cancer Mission and should include a budget for networking, attendance at meetings, and joint activities.”
- “The successful proposals are expected to build on resources made available by the Knowledge Centre on Cancer (KCC) to foster EU alignment and coordination.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 45 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Lump sum: the budget is fixed per work package and paid when each work package is completed. Every work package needs activities and deliverables an evaluator can verify, and the effort must match the money.
- Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes: “The thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence), 4 (Impact) and 4 (Implementation). The cumulative threshold is 12.”
Impact pathway and traps
- Users or citizens are part of the scope. Show how they take part in the design and testing, not only that they are informed.
- The Joint Research Centre may take part. Decide whether its involvement helps, and say so if you include it.
- Open science or data practices are named. Make the data management plan concrete: which data, which repository, when.
- The gender dimension is named in the topic. Show how sex and gender analysis enters the research content, not only team balance.
- Market uptake is part of the scope. Evaluators look for a credible route to market with named first adopters.
- Policy or regulation is in scope. Name the policy owners you will reach and what you will give them.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
Patients with rare and very rare cancers across EU Member States and Associated Countries often present with advanced disease due to late diagnosis and have access to few treatment options. Hence, these patients typically have a lower 5-year overall survival than those with more common cancers and face challenges with timely access to a small number of appropriate phase 1 clinical trials, despite good disease control rates, to validate biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions targeting their disease and adapted to an increasingly precision oncology healthcare landscape. Proposals should address all the following: When still relevant and required, finalise the preclinical validation of promising biomarker-guided drugs, for rare or very rare cancer indications through in vivo and/or ex vivo and/or in silico research models. Drug repurposing should be considered. Data should be disaggregated by tumour biology, sex, gender, age and other relevant variables, such as by measures of socio-economic status or ethnicity; Validate early safety and efficacy of innovative medicines or as part of multi-modal treatment interventions in phase 1, including in first-in-human, multi-centre clinical trials, considering new trial designs, for and with patients with rare or very rare cancers and their caregivers/families; The primary and secondary endpoints of the clinical trial(s) should support safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Such endpoints should be defined together with patients and their caregivers through research that stimulates social innovation and supports end-user engagement using participative research models. All datasets produced should be described with metadata records in the EU dataset catalogue of the European Health Data Space, while all tools and models should take advantage of current European research infrastructures, should follow the principles of open science and made available through the future UNCAN.eu platform; Applicants should include proof of advice from regulators on the design of the clinical trial(s), include an appropriate mix of stakeholders from various disciplines, and regional as well as national health authorities, and provide details of the clinical study(ies) in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system; Successful proposals will be asked to join the 'Diagnosis and treatment” cluster for the EU Cancer Mission and should include a budget for networking, attendance at meetings, and joint activities. The Commission will facilitate coordination of these activities. The successful proposals are expected to build on resources made available by the Knowledge Centre on Cancer (KCC) to foster EU alignment and coordination. Innovators turn research results into new and better services and products, to remain competitive in a global marketplace and to improve the quality of life of Europe’s citizens. ~24% of all cancers are rare. For definition and incidence of rare cancers see ESMO and RARECARE Profile and outcome of cancer patients enrolled in contemporary phase I trials - ScienceDirect for example promising efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data any relevant molecular target, biomarker, therapeutic strategy or technology Potential applicants may want to consider ongoing EU-funded efforts like REMEDI4ALL and/or REPO4EU. decentralised clinical trials, basket trials, umbrella trials, roll-over/extension trials, adaptive trials in order to address the objectives of the EU Cancer Mission, participants will collaborate in project clusters to leverage EU-funding, increase networking across sectors and disciplines, and establish a portfolio of EU Cancer Mission R&I and policy actions. Examples of those activities are research or research capacity, organising joint workshops, establishing best practices, joint communication or citizen engagement activities with projects funded under other clusters and pillars of Horizon Europe, or other EU programmes, as appropriate. Proposals are not required to include details of these activities, as they will be defined during the grant agreement preparation and during the life of the project. Hosted by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC). Especially through the ’European Guidelines and Quality Assurance Schemes for Breast, Colorectal and Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis‘, and the ’European Cancer Information System (ECIS)’ and the ’European Cancer Inequalities Registry (ECIR), see https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/cancer_en.
Other topics in HORIZON-MISS-2027-02
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-01 — Leveraging functional genomics to reveal novel targets for cancer treatment
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-02 — Clinical research by Comprehensive Cancer Infrastructures for the benefit of…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-04 — Improving equitable health outcomes and added value for and with cancer…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-05 — Pre-commercial procurement of affordable solutions for healthcare systems in…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-06 — Support a Young Cancer Survivor Quality of Life (QoL) research programme by…
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.