| Topic | HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-02 |
|---|---|
| Status | Forthcoming |
| Call | HORIZON-MISS-2027-02 — Supporting the implementation of the Cancer Mission |
| Type of action | Innovation Actions · lump sum |
| Opening | 10 February 2027 |
| Deadline | 16 September 2027 |
| Budget | EUR 7 million to EUR 10 million per project · 3 projects expected · EUR 20 million in total |
| Part B page limit | 45 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Proposals under this topic should aim to deliver results that are directed and tailored towards, and contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:”
- EO1 Patients afflicted by lung, bowel, breast or prostate cancer, will benefit from the outcomes of evidence-based, tailored, innovative, affordable and accessible diagnosis- and treatment-centred clinical research programmes by comprehensive cancer infrastructures.
- EO2 Researchers, physicians, patient representatives, civil society, charities, foundations, insurance companies, SMEs and innovators will seize opportunities to respectively co-create, support, upscale or commercialise outcomes of evidence-based, tailored, affordable and accessible clinical research programmes for the diagnosis and treatment of patients afflicted by lung, bowel, breast or prostate cancer.
- EO3 National and regional healthcare providers, healthcare payers, policymakers and authorities in European regions, EU Member States and Associated Countries have the evidence to engage in piloting, upscaling or implementing appropriate clinical research programmes for the diagnosis and treatment of patients afflicted by lung, bowel, breast or prostate cancer.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO3), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “Applicants should address all of the following:.”
- “Comprehensive cancer infrastructures should extensively pilot and upscale innovative diagnostic or treatment programmes in at least four different EU Member States or Associated Countries.”
- “One of the four targeted EU Member States or Associated Countries should represent a country without or with a less developed comprehensive cancer infrastructure.”
- “Innovative clinical research programmes should be defined together with patients and their caregivers/families using participative research models and adapted to the needs of the target population and the specificities of healthcare provision at local, regional, or national level, duly reflecting the (cultural) diversity and available resources across EU Member States and Associated Countries.”
- “Data should be disaggregated by sex, gender, age and other relevant variables, such as by measures of socio-economic status or ethnicity.”
- “All datasets produced should be described with metadata records in the EU dataset catalogue of the European Health Data Space, while all tools and models should take advantage of current European research infrastructures, should follow the principles of open science and made available through the future UNCAN.eu platform.”
- “Applicants should include an appropriate mix of stakeholders from various disciplines and sectors and provide details of the clinical study(ies) in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system.”
- “Successful proposals will be asked to join the 'Diagnosis and treatment” cluster for the EU Cancer Mission and should include a budget for networking, attendance at meetings, and joint activities.”
- “The successful proposals are expected to build on relevant networks launched under the Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan that could facilitate cross-border clinical trials, resources made available by relevant ESFRI Research Infrastructures, and the Knowledge Centre on Cancer (KCC) to foster EU alignment and coordination.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 45 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Lump sum: the budget is fixed per work package and paid when each work package is completed. Every work package needs activities and deliverables an evaluator can verify, and the effort must match the money.
- Innovation action: evaluators expect a plausible path to commercialisation and named first users or customers.
- Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes: “The thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence), 4 (Impact) and 4 (Implementation). The cumulative threshold is 12.”
Impact pathway and traps
- Users or citizens are part of the scope. Show how they take part in the design and testing, not only that they are informed.
- The scope expects pilots or demonstration. Name the sites, the partners who run them and what is measured there.
- The Joint Research Centre may take part. Decide whether its involvement helps, and say so if you include it.
- Open science or data practices are named. Make the data management plan concrete: which data, which repository, when.
- The gender dimension is named in the topic. Show how sex and gender analysis enters the research content, not only team balance.
- Market uptake is part of the scope. Evaluators look for a credible route to market with named first adopters.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
Lung, bowel, breast and prostate cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence across EU Member States and Associated Countries are increasing while showing substantial variation, with Central and Eastern European communities, regions and countries particularly affected. At the same time, the level of development of comprehensive cancer infrastructures continues to vary considerably across EU Member States and Associated Countries, contributing to inequalities, in particular in terms of clinical research capacity as well as quality of and access to innovative diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Applicants should address all of the following: Comprehensive cancer infrastructures across the EU Member States and Associated Countries come together to conduct clinical research on lung, bowel, breast or prostate cancer focusing on at least one of the following areas: Innovative diagnostics; Radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy; Therapeutic cancer vaccines for the treatment of cancer patients with early-stage, advanced, metastatic or minimal residual disease (e.g. after debulking by surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy); Implementation of appropriate clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment in countries without or with limited Comprehensive Cancer Infrastructures; Comprehensive cancer infrastructures should extensively pilot and upscale innovative diagnostic or treatment programmes in at least four different EU Member States or Associated Countries. One of the four targeted EU Member States or Associated Countries should represent a country without or with a less developed comprehensive cancer infrastructure. To ensure that together they address - and whenever feasible - overcome challenges because of the national, regional, or local research and healthcare context (e.g. those faced by small(er) EU Member States, or due to a large rural population, or particular cancer burden, socio-economic or environmental situation, or limited clinical research capacity), when designing and conducting innovative clinical research programmes with added value for the timely diagnosis and treatment of patients with lung, bowel, breast or prostate cancer; Identify additional resources through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Technical Support Instrument, the Resilience and Recovery Facility (RRF), philanthropy, the European Investment Bank Group (EIB, EIF) or any other initiative; Innovative clinical research programmes should be defined together with patients and their caregivers/families using participative research models and adapted to the needs of the target population and the specificities of healthcare provision at local, regional, or national level, duly reflecting the (cultural) diversity and available resources across EU Member States and Associated Countries; Data should be disaggregated by sex, gender, age and other relevant variables, such as by measures of socio-economic status or ethnicity; All datasets produced should be described with metadata records in the EU dataset catalogue of the European Health Data Space, while all tools and models should take advantage of current European research infrastructures, should follow the principles of open science and made available through the future UNCAN.eu platform; Applicants should include an appropriate mix of stakeholders from various disciplines and sectors and provide details of the clinical study(ies) in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system. Successful proposals will be asked to join the 'Diagnosis and treatment” cluster for the EU Cancer Mission and should include a budget for networking, attendance at meetings, and joint activities. The Commission will facilitate coordination of these activities. The successful proposals are expected to build on relevant networks launched under the Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan that could facilitate cross-border clinical trials, resources made available by relevant ESFRI Research Infrastructures, and the Knowledge Centre on Cancer (KCC) to foster EU alignment and coordination. Any age group or cancer subtype National or regional infrastructures that provide resources and services to support, improve and integrate cancer care, research, training of care professionals and education for cancer patients, survivors and their families/carers of any age group. Hence, comprehensive cancer infrastructures could consist of any combination, number or type of -public or private- cancer centre, hospital, university medical centre, research department or institute, company, public health facility, etc. Innovators turn research results into new and better services and products, to remain competitive in a global marketplace and to improve the quality of life of Europe’s citizens. Cancer inequalities registry: https://cancer-inequalities.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ research laboratories, diagnostics and clinical trial infrastructures Technical Support Instrument (TSI), DG REFORM Homepage | European Investment Bank eif.org/index.htm such as physicians, academia, patients and their caregivers, patient representatives, engineers, behavioural scientists, SMEs, business networks, insurance companies, charities and foundations, research organisations, civil society. In order to address the objectives of the EU Cancer Mission, participants will collaborate in project clusters to leverage EU-funding, increase networking across sectors and disciplines, and establish a portfolio of EU Cancer Mission R&I and policy actions. Examples of those activities are research or research capacity, organising joint workshops, establishing best practices, joint communication or citizen engagement activities with projects funded under other clusters and pillars of Horizon Europe, or other EU programmes, as appropriate. Proposals are not required to include details of these activities, as they will be defined during the grant agreement preparation and during the life of the…
Other topics in HORIZON-MISS-2027-02
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-01 — Leveraging functional genomics to reveal novel targets for cancer treatment
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-03 — Phase 1 including first-in-human clinical trials to test biomarker-guided…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-04 — Improving equitable health outcomes and added value for and with cancer…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-05 — Pre-commercial procurement of affordable solutions for healthcare systems in…
- HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-06 — Support a Young Cancer Survivor Quality of Life (QoL) research programme by…
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.