| Topic | HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-BUSINESS-01 |
|---|---|
| Status | Open |
| Call | HORIZON-NEB-2026-01 — Beautiful, inclusive and sustainable neighbourhoods for communities |
| Destination | Innovative funding and new business models for transformation of neighbourhoods (2026-27) |
| Type of action | Innovation Actions · lump sum |
| Opening | 5 May 2026 |
| Deadline | 1 December 2026 |
| Budget | around EUR 3.5 million per project · 3 projects expected · EUR 10.5 million in total |
| Part B page limit | 45 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:”
- EO1 Evidence of the structural social infrastructure and services needed to address homelessness at neighbourhood level is made available to stakeholders involved in tackling homelessness.
- EO2 Improved availability and accessibility of key social infrastructure and services for homeless groups in the targeted neighbourhoods.
Expected impacts named in the destination
The wider, long-term effects the destination seeks. Your outcomes feed them; they are not project deliverables.
- EI1 Better understanding of the contextual local conditions that drive or hinder sustainable neighbourhood developments and the uptake of NEB-aligned solutions and projects, such as capital and real estate market dynamics and socioeconomic, cultural, demographic, and climatic changes.
- EI2 Anticipation and consideration of future needs, functions and inhabitants (including more-than-human perspectives) of neighbourhoods and their developments towards the future.
- EI3 Demonstrated socioeconomic, financial, environmental, cultural, and aesthetic value of NEB-aligned solutions and projects driving the revitalisation of the built environment in neighbourhoods.
- EI4 Increased investment in the transformation of neighbourhoods in line with NEB through alternative, innovative, and community-based investment and ownership approaches.
- EI5 Community and place-based approaches that adopt a systemic perspective and use co-creation approaches with diverse local stakeholders, including marginalised or underrepresented groups or those in a vulnerable situation, and contribute to addressing pressing community challenges and needs such as homelessness and housing.
- EI6 Circular manufacturing, renovation, and reuse approaches in the built environment contribute to the sufficient use of resources and space.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO2), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “While housing-led approaches are crucial to tackle homelessness, addressing the structural and multidimensional causes of homelessness also requires systemic interventions focusing on social infrastructure and services in neighbourhoods.”
- “They must be developed and made available in a coordinated manner that mitigates the interconnected root causes of homelessness in the long term and supports the reintegration and social inclusion of individuals in communities by avoiding long-term dependence on emergency support.”
- “Research is required on how to analyse the interconnected, contextual conditions that drive and mitigate homelessness at the neighbourhood level and how to inform strategies to structurally address homelessness.”
- “Proposals are expected to address all of the following:.”
- “The approach must cover at least the following: Analysis of local neighbourhood context and existing built environment in terms of availability and equitable access to relevant social infrastructures and services, particularly for chronic homelessness and marginalised groups or those in a vulnerable situation.”
- “Proposals are expected to follow a participatory and transdisciplinary approach through the integration of different actors and disciplines.”
- “This topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities.”
- “Proposals are encouraged to exploit synergies with successful proposals from the topic ‘HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-PARTICIPATION-01: Addressing homelessness through housing-led approaches aligned with the New European Bauhaus’ to avoid duplication and exploit opportunities for increased impact.”
- “Proposals are expected to allocate at least 0.8% of their budget for engaging with the Horizon Europe-funded 'New European Bauhaus hub for results and impact' to share their intermediate and final results, findings and learnings, as well as to contribute to impact assessment.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 45 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Lump sum: the budget is fixed per work package and paid when each work package is completed. Every work package needs activities and deliverables an evaluator can verify, and the effort must match the money.
- Innovation action: evaluators expect a plausible path to commercialisation and named first users or customers.
Impact pathway and traps
- The topic asks for social sciences and humanities (SSH) expertise. Evaluators look for SSH partners with a real role in the methodology, not a token task.
- The topic expects cooperation with other projects or initiatives. Reserve effort and budget for it in the work plan.
- The gender dimension is named in the topic. Show how sex and gender analysis enters the research content, not only team balance.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- For each destination impact you claim, show which of your outcomes feeds it. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
Based on 2024 data, over 1.2 million people are estimated to experience homelessness in Europe, with a significant proportion (45%) of surveyed homeless individuals finding themselves in a situation of chronic homelessness for over two years. While housing-led approaches are crucial to tackle homelessness, addressing the structural and multidimensional causes of homelessness also requires systemic interventions focusing on social infrastructure and services in neighbourhoods. Social infrastructure and services include the physical places as well as public and community sector facilities and services that support and enable access to healthcare, employment, education, community integration, and other social services. They must be developed and made available in a coordinated manner that mitigates the interconnected root causes of homelessness in the long term and supports the reintegration and social inclusion of individuals in communities by avoiding long-term dependence on emergency support. This is especially important considering that chronic homelessness is often accompanied by a complex mix of needs and physical and psychological functional variations. Research is required on how to analyse the interconnected, contextual conditions that drive and mitigate homelessness at the neighbourhood level and how to inform strategies to structurally address homelessness. Proposals are expected to address all of the following: Develop a system-based approach to mitigate homelessness and support the reintegration of individuals in communities by coordinating key social infrastructure and services (including healthcare, education, employment, community integration and other relevant social services) at neighbourhood level. The approach must cover at least the following: Analysis of local neighbourhood context and existing built environment in terms of availability and equitable access to relevant social infrastructures and services, particularly for chronic homelessness and marginalised groups or those in a vulnerable situation. Assessment of the impact and potential correlation between infrastructure and service design in the built environment and the degree of homelessness in neighbourhoods. Development of strategies to overcome challenges of coordinating key social infrastructure and services at neighbourhood level (such as data limitations and fragmentation, siloed and fragmented social service systems, and funding challenges for scalability). Analysis of the views, willingness, and ability of homeless groups, especially those experiencing chronic homelessness, to engage with and benefit from the provided social infrastructures and services. Assessment of the potential impacts on community (re)integration and participation, well-being, social cohesion, and a sense of belonging in neighbourhoods for both homeless groups and the broader community in neighbourhoods. Assessment of the socioeconomic impact of the system-based approach through measurable indicators on social infrastructure and service accessibility and use. Provision of recommendations and guidance to apply the approach in other neighbourhoods, considering contextual factors such as unequal geographical distribution of and access to social infrastructure and services (considering factors including gender, sexual orientation, age, physical and psychological functional variations, or other relevant social factors), and local homelessness conditions. Develop and validate the approach in at least five neighbourhoods located in different Member States and/or Associated Countries. Proposals are expected to follow a participatory and transdisciplinary approach through the integration of different actors and disciplines. This topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities. Proposals are encouraged to exploit synergies with successful proposals from the topic ‘HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-PARTICIPATION-01: Addressing homelessness through housing-led approaches aligned with the New European Bauhaus’ to avoid duplication and exploit opportunities for increased impact. Proposals are expected to allocate at least 0.8% of their budget for engaging with the Horizon Europe-funded 'New European Bauhaus hub for results and impact' to share their intermediate and final results, findings and learnings, as well as to contribute to impact assessment. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. This figure represents rough sleepers, people staying in night shelters, and those in temporary accommodation for the homeless across Europe, including the UK. FEANTSA, ‘Homelessness in Europe The State of Play‘, NINTH OVERVIEW OF HOUSING EXCLUSION IN EUROPE, Chapter 1, 2024, "https://www.feantsa.org/public/user/Activities/events/2024/9th_overview/EN_Chap/1.pdf" https://www.feantsa.org/public/user/Activities/events/2024/9th_overview/EN_Chap/1.pdf See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition of ”participatory process” in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27. See definition in the Glossary section of the NEB part of the HE WP26-27.
Other topics in HORIZON-NEB-2026-01
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-BUSINESS-02 — Understanding capital market dynamics for increased investment in New European…
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-BUSINESS-03 — Approaches to reuse vacant, obsolete or underutilised spaces
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-PARTICIPATION-01 — Addressing homelessness through housing-led approaches aligned with the New…
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-PARTICIPATION-02 — Innovative approaches for the spatial design of neighbourhoods
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-PARTICIPATION-03 — Understanding inhabitant’s experiences of neighbourhoods to support their…
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-REGEN-01 — Sustainable, inclusive, affordable and beautiful solutions for thermal comfort…
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-REGEN-02 — Advancing sustainable maintenance and repair measures for existing buildings
- HORIZON-NEB-2026-01-REGEN-03 — Innovative solutions for the sustainable and beautiful use of vertical space
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.