GrantWise
HORIZON EUROPE TOPIC · Cluster 1 · Health

Clinical trials for advancing innovative interventions for neurodegenerative diseases

HORIZON-HLTH-2027-02-DISEASE-14-two-stage — the expected outcomes as checkable statements, what evaluators look for in this topic, and the conditions that shape the proposal.

Get the free Part B working draft for this topic ↓

ForthcomingRIADeadline 17 February 2027around EUR 10 million per project

GrantWise › Horizon Europe topics › HORIZON-HLTH-2027-02-DISEASE-14-two-stage

TopicHORIZON-HLTH-2027-02-DISEASE-14-two-stage
StatusForthcoming
CallHORIZON-HLTH-2027-02-two-stage — Cluster 1 - Health (Two stage - 2027)
Type of actionResearch and Innovation Actions · two-stage
Opening29 October 2026
Deadlines17 February 2027 (stage 1) · 16 September 2027 (stage 2)
Budgetaround EUR 10 million per project · 4 projects expected · EUR 39.3 million in total
Part B page limit40 pages (standard application form; check your call)
TemplateWork Programme 2026–2027 application form

Expected outcomes

Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “This topic aims at supporting activities that are enabling or contributing to one or several expected impacts of destination “Tackling diseases and reducing disease burden”. To that end, proposals under this topic should aim to deliver results that are directed at, tailored towards and contributing to all the following expected outcomes:”

  1. EO1 The scientific and clinical communities make effective use of state-of-the-art knowledge, data, technologies, tools, methods, best practices, and trainings to underpin and complement the development of innovative interventions aimed at more effective treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.
  2. EO2 The scientific and clinical communities benefit from the exchange of data, knowledge and best practices, thereby strengthening their collaboration in the EU, the Associated Countries and beyond.
  3. EO3 The scientific and clinical communities make wide use of relevant databases and/or integrate them with existing infrastructures for storage and sharing of collected data according to FAIR principles, thereby encouraging further use of the data.
  4. EO4 Policymakers, funders, scientific and clinical communities, patient organisations, regulators, and other relevant bodies are informed of the research advances made and the requirements for a widespread implementation of the innovative therapeutic interventions and complementary approaches.
  5. EO5 Patients and caregivers are constructively engaged with the research, ensuring that their needs are catered for, with the aim of tangibly benefitting from the interventions.

What evaluators will look for in this topic

Expected outcomes

  • Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
  • For each outcome (EO1 to EO5), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
  • Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.

What the scope asks for

Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.

  • “Given the limitations with current therapeutic solutions, including that they primarily address symptoms rather than underlying causes and can have serious side effects, together with the increasing prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases in an aging population, there is a huge need to develop more innovative, safer and more effective therapeutic solutions for these diseases.”
  • “To further enhance their safety and effectiveness, the therapeutic solution based on an active substance should be combined/complemented with another multidisciplinary approach (e.g. lifestyle changes, cognitive training, rehabilitation therapies).”
  • “Together this innovative intervention should lead to an improved quality of life and reduce the societal impact of these diseases.”
  • “Proposals should address most of the following aspects:.”
  • “This insight should open the path to more personalised interventions and approaches.”
  • “Utilise existing data, biobanks, registries and/or cohorts, together with the generation of new data that should be managed in line with the FAIR principles.”
  • “The participation of start-ups, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is encouraged with the aim of strengthening their scientific and technological foundations, enhancing their innovation potential, and exploring possibilities for commercial exploitation.”
  • “Funded projects should liaise with the co-funded European Partnership for Brain Health, covered by topic HORIZON-HLTH-2025-02-DISEASE-01: “European Partnership for Brain Health”.”
  • “The topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities.”
  • “Therefore, proposals should include a budget for the attendance to regular joint meetings and may consider covering the costs of any other potential joint activities without the prerequisite to detail concrete joint activities at this stage.”
  • “Applicants should provide details of their clinical studies in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system.”
  • “As proposals under this topic are expected to include clinical studies, the use of the template is strongly encouraged.”

Conditions that shape the proposal

  • Part B, sections 1–3: 40 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
  • Two-stage submission: the first stage uses a shorter proposal and is assessed on Excellence and Impact only. Check the page limit and sections in the stage-one form of your call.
  • Admissibility Conditions, proposal page limit and layout: “Applicants submitting a proposal for a blind evaluation (see General Annex F) must not disclose their organisation names, acronyms, logos nor names of personnel in the proposal abstract and Part B of their first-stage application (see General Annex E).”
  • Other Eligibility Conditions: “In recognition of the opening of the US National Institutes of Health’s programmes to European researchers, any legal entity established in the United States of America is eligible to receive Union funding.”
  • Other Eligibility Conditions: “Subject to restrictions for the protection of European communication networks.”
  • Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds: “The first-stage proposals of this topic will be evaluated blindly.”
  • Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes: “For the first stage, the thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence) and 4 (Impact). The overall threshold applying to the sum of the two individual scores will be set at a level that ensures the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 is as close as possible to four times the available…”
  • Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes: “For the second stage, the thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence), 4 (Impact) and 4 (Implementation). The cumulative threshold will be 12.”

Impact pathway and traps

  • The topic asks for social sciences and humanities (SSH) expertise. Evaluators look for SSH partners with a real role in the methodology, not a token task.
  • Users or citizens are part of the scope. Show how they take part in the design and testing, not only that they are informed.
  • Open science or data practices are named. Make the data management plan concrete: which data, which repository, when.
  • The gender dimension is named in the topic. Show how sex and gender analysis enters the research content, not only team balance.
  • Policy or regulation is in scope. Name the policy owners you will reach and what you will give them.
  • Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
  • Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
  • Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
  • Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published

Neurodegenerative diseases are a high burden for patients, caregivers, health systems and society. Given the limitations with current therapeutic solutions, including that they primarily address symptoms rather than underlying causes and can have serious side effects, together with the increasing prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases in an aging population, there is a huge need to develop more innovative, safer and more effective therapeutic solutions for these diseases. To further enhance their safety and effectiveness, the therapeutic solution based on an active substance should be combined/complemented with another multidisciplinary approach (e.g. lifestyle changes, cognitive training, rehabilitation therapies). Together this innovative intervention should lead to an improved quality of life and reduce the societal impact of these diseases. Rare neurodegenerative diseases are excluded. Proposals should address most of the following aspects: Perform rigorous early-stage clinical trials into the safety and efficacy of the innovative interventions and their mode of administration, ensuring adequate cohorts/sample sizes with adequate representation of the patient population, including in terms of age, sex and ethnicity. Through the clinical trials and to the extent possible of additional studies, gain further insight into the potentially novel mechanism(s) of action of the innovative therapies and complementary approaches. This could entail analyses of imaging (e.g. MRI, ultrasound, nuclear imaging), as well as physiological, molecular, biochemical or omics signatures revealing potential perturbations prior to the intervention and recovery/improvement thereafter, and it could lead to the development of surrogate endpoints. This insight should open the path to more personalised interventions and approaches. Use and/or develop technologies, including digital ones (e.g. (generative) Artificial Intelligence - AI, wearable technologies) to help implement and monitor the long-term efficacy of the intervention(s), as well as manage the disorder and/or monitor their progression (e.g. with unobtrusive technologies suitable for patient monitoring at home and in real-world conditions), whilst also ensuring they are bias-free, inclusive, and ethically sound. Utilise existing data, biobanks, registries and/or cohorts, together with the generation of new data that should be managed in line with the FAIR principles. Engage all relevant stakeholders (especially patients and patients’ representatives for the disease, caregivers, clinicians, counsellors, regulators, etc.) to design end-user optimised interventions, applying gender-sensitive and intersectional approaches. Advance research by leveraging already existing and emerging state-of-the-art research infrastructures (e.g. EuroBioImaging, European Genomic Data Infrastructure, ECRIN, EATRIS, EBRAINS, BBMRI, etc.), as well as results stemming from EU-supported research projects, where applicable. Engage with national public health authorities and regulators to ensure a robust development pathway and further uptake of the intervention. The participation of start-ups, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is encouraged with the aim of strengthening their scientific and technological foundations, enhancing their innovation potential, and exploring possibilities for commercial exploitation. Funded projects should liaise with the co-funded European Partnership for Brain Health, covered by topic HORIZON-HLTH-2025-02-DISEASE-01: “European Partnership for Brain Health”. The topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities. All projects funded under this topic are strongly encouraged to participate in networking and joint activities, as appropriate. Therefore, proposals should include a budget for the attendance to regular joint meetings and may consider covering the costs of any other potential joint activities without the prerequisite to detail concrete joint activities at this stage. The details of these joint activities will be defined during the grant agreement preparation phase. Applicants should provide details of their clinical studies in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system. As proposals under this topic are expected to include clinical studies, the use of the template is strongly encouraged. See definition of FAIR data in the introduction to this Work Programme part. Rare diseases, as defined by the European Union Regulation on Orphan Medicinal Products (1999), being a disease that affects not more than 1 person per 2000 in the European population (https://www.orpha.net/). For pharmacological-based interventions: phase 1 and/or phase 2 clinical trials. Generative AI is a type of AI technology that can generate various forms of new content such as text, images, sounds, and even code, such as for programming or gene sequencing (https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/101621). https://www.eurobioimaging.eu https://gdi.onemilliongenomes.eu https://ecrin.org https://eatris.eu https://www.ebrains.eu https://www.bbmri-eric.eu Consult databases e.g. CORDIS (https://cordis.europa.eu) & the JPND Research Database (https://neurodegenerationresearch.eu/search-our-database). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003H0361 https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101259512, https://www.brainhealth-partnership.eu Please note that the definition of clinical studies (see introduction to this Work Programme part) is broad and it is recommended that you review it thoroughly before submitting your application.

Other topics in HORIZON-HLTH-2027-02-two-stage

Source and attribution

Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.