| Topic | HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-ENVHLTH-02 |
|---|---|
| Status | Forthcoming |
| Call | HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01 — Cluster 1 - Health (Single stage - 2027/1) |
| Type of action | Research and Innovation Actions |
| Opening | 29 October 2026 |
| Deadline | 17 February 2027 |
| Budget | EUR 10 million to EUR 11 million per project · 4 projects expected · EUR 45 million in total |
| Part B page limit | 40 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
The topic does not say whether all outcomes must be addressed; treat them all as relevant. The topic says: “This topic aims at supporting activities that are enabling or contributing to one or several expected impacts of destination “Living and working in a health-promoting environment”. To that end, proposals under this topic should aim to deliver results that are directed at, tailored towards and contributing to most of the following expected outcomes:”
- EO1 Researchers, policymakers, healthcare practitioners and the public have a more comprehensive understanding of the human exposome and the interactions between climatic, environmental and socio-behavioural factors, supported by FAIR data linking these exposures to disease and health outcomes.
- EO2 Researchers, governments, policymakers, social care services and healthcare practitioners have improved knowledge on the links between the climatic, social, lifestyle and environmental factors of the exposome and global health burden, supporting their efforts to adopt the exposome approach to identify and address relevant health impacts.
- EO3 The public has access to the latest information on the influence of global environmental exposures on health, enabling the adoption of health-promoting, climate-resilient and nature-positive behaviours.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- The topic does not say whether all outcomes must be addressed; treat them all as relevant.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO3), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “Research activities under this topic should strengthen the use of the exposome approach to study global exposures and generate evidence on their health implications.”
- “Proposals should focus on integrating climate-related factors into exposome research and understanding how the exposome changes in response to direct and indirect climate exposures.”
- “Moreover, research activities should be multiscale and multidisciplinary and account for the complexity and multifactorial nature of health determinants and the most pressing unmet medical needs in relation to environmental degradation and disrupted ecosystems.”
- “Proposals should include climate-relevant social determinants of health as part of their proposed activities.”
- “More specifically, research actions under this topic should include all the following activities:.”
- “In addition, research actions should include several of the following targeted activities:.”
- “When handling vulnerability data and indicators, sex-, gender-, racial or ethnic origin -disaggregated data should be collected and analysed, incorporating intersectional factors where feasible and relevant.”
- “International cooperation is encouraged, in particular with regions that are under-represented in human exposome research.”
- “Projects should leverage the knowledge, data and tools already generated under past initiatives such as EHEN and ongoing initiatives such as IHEN, ICOS ERIC and EIRENE RI.”
- “Proposals are encouraged to consider, where relevant, the data, expertise and services offered by European research infrastructures in the environment, climate and health domain.”
- “Projects should make the tools developed as part of their research available on the IHEN Exposome Toolbox and upload their data sets in the IHEN Data Catalogue.”
- “Proposals should make sure that relevant activities, outcomes and outputs are shared with the European Climate and Health Observatory through the cluster that will be formed after the approval of the proposals.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 40 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Other Eligibility Conditions: “In recognition of the opening of the US National Institutes of Health’s programmes to European researchers, any legal entity established in the United States of America is eligible to receive Union funding.”
- Other Eligibility Conditions: “The Joint Research Centre (JRC) may participate as member of the consortium selected for funding as a beneficiary with zero funding, or as an associated partner. The JRC will not participate in the preparation and submission of the proposal - see General Annex B.”
- Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes: “The thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence), 4 (Impact) and 4 (Implementation). The cumulative threshold will be 12.”
- Legal and financial set-up of the grants: “Beneficiaries will be subject to the following additional dissemination obligations: Proposals should ensure that chemical monitoring and human biomonitoring data are shared in the Common Data Platform for Chemicals and its services such as the Information Platform for Chemical Monitoring - IPCHEM[[…”
- Legal and financial set-up of the grants: “In order to maximise synergies and increase the impact of the projects, all proposals selected for funding from this topic will form a cluster and be required to participate in common networking and joint activities (and in determining modalities for their implementation and the specific responsibilities of…”
- Legal and financial set-up of the grants: “Periodic report of joint activities (delivered at each reporting period).”
Impact pathway and traps
- The topic asks for social sciences and humanities (SSH) expertise. Evaluators look for SSH partners with a real role in the methodology, not a token task.
- Standardisation is mentioned. Name the committees or bodies and the partner who engages with them.
- International cooperation is part of the scope. Explain what the non-EU partners add and how the cooperation is organised.
- Open science or data practices are named. Make the data management plan concrete: which data, which repository, when.
- The gender dimension is named in the topic. Show how sex and gender analysis enters the research content, not only team balance.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- Link your outcomes to the destination's expected impacts in the Work Programme. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
The exposome is the totality of exposures (and their interactions) experienced by an individual throughout their lifetime, including chemical, physical, biological, nutritional and psychosocial factors, from conception onwards. Many of these factors originate in the environment, including climate-related exposures such as extreme heat, heightened air pollution or drought. Climate change may amplify or interact synergistically with other better-established exposures, dynamically altering the human exposome and its health implications. Despite this, climate factors remain underrepresented in large-scale human exposome studies. Research activities under this topic should strengthen the use of the exposome approach to study global exposures and generate evidence on their health implications. Proposals should focus on integrating climate-related factors into exposome research and understanding how the exposome changes in response to direct and indirect climate exposures. Moreover, research activities should be multiscale and multidisciplinary and account for the complexity and multifactorial nature of health determinants and the most pressing unmet medical needs in relation to environmental degradation and disrupted ecosystems. Proposals should include climate-relevant social determinants of health as part of their proposed activities. More specifically, research actions under this topic should include all the following activities: Incorporate multiple climate exposures into exposomics studies and provide insights on their influence on disease burden, through interactions with other exposome factors. Predict, identify and monitor changes in the exposome (including environmental, social and occupational exposures) resulting from climate-related pressures and study their health implications to identify emerging health risks and potential benefits of climate change. Advance data generation, analysis, integration and interpretation in human exposomics, developing methodologies and integrating novel approaches (e.g. AI technologies and machine learning) for advanced data analytics, including for Real-World Data (RWD). In addition, research actions should include several of the following targeted activities: Establish and investigate the biological pathways and mechanisms by which the exposome drives health impacts, jointly considering climate-related and other exposures. Build upon (when relevant) and study existing and/or newly generated longitudinal cohorts that combine individual exposome data with the corresponding medical, omics and biological data. Identify exposome-relevant indicators and biomarkers for exposome-related health risks and potential benefits using comprehensive exposome studies that combine climate, environmental, behavioural and social exposures. Account for disparities in individual trajectories and exposure patterns where relevant. Report on health-relevant exposome findings using, where possible, standardised metrics to ensure harmonised reporting of exposome-driven disease burden across regions and sectors. Build on existing exposome toolboxes and increase their robustness and coverage by integrating climate related exposures. Study the role of socioeconomic (e.g. income, energy poverty, occupation), demographic (e.g. gender, racial or ethnic origin, age) and behavioural (e.g. public trust, risk perception) factors in determining patterns of exposure, using the exposome approach to generate knowledge on intersectional vulnerability and resilience to exposome-driven (including climate-driven) health impacts. Identify disproportionately affected populations and develop interventions to reduce disparities. When handling vulnerability data and indicators, sex-, gender-, racial or ethnic origin -disaggregated data should be collected and analysed, incorporating intersectional factors where feasible and relevant. International cooperation is encouraged, in particular with regions that are under-represented in human exposome research. Projects should leverage the knowledge, data and tools already generated under past initiatives such as EHEN and ongoing initiatives such as IHEN, ICOS ERIC and EIRENE RI. Proposals are encouraged to consider, where relevant, the data, expertise and services offered by European research infrastructures in the environment, climate and health domain. Projects should make the tools developed as part of their research available on the IHEN Exposome Toolbox and upload their data sets in the IHEN Data Catalogue. In order to maximise synergies and increase the impact of the projects, all proposals selected for funding from this topic will form a cluster and be required to participate in common networking and joint activities. Guidance on the potential activities to be developed can be obtained by consulting the ongoing clusters of projects under the Environment, Climate and Health research portfolio. Proposals should make sure that relevant activities, outcomes and outputs are shared with the European Climate and Health Observatory through the cluster that will be formed after the approval of the proposals. This topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities. Applicants envisaging to include clinical studies should provide details of their clinical studies in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system. See definition of FAIR data in the introduction to this Work Programme part. EMA definition: “Real-World Data are routinely collected data relating to patient health status or the delivery of healthcare from a variety of sources other than traditional clinical trials (e.g. claims databases, hospital data, electronic health records, registries, mhealth data,…
Other topics in HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-CARE-02 — Personalised approaches to reduce risks from Adverse Drug Reactions due to…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-DISEASE-05 — Development of novel small molecule antiviral therapeutics for pathogens with…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-DISEASE-06 — Development of monoclonal antibodies to prevent and treat infections from…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-DISEASE-07 — Development of monoclonal antibodies to prevent and treat infections from…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-DISEASE-08 — Development of innovative antimicrobials against pathogens resistant to…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-DISEASE-10 — Prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases in children and…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-ENVHLTH-MISSCLIMA-03 — Tools and technologies to support health adaptation to climate change
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-IND-01 — Development of cell-free protein synthesis platforms for discovery and/or…
- HORIZON-HLTH-2027-01-STAYHLTH-01 — Addressing disabilities through the life course to support independent living…
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.