| Topic | HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-CIRCBIO-08 |
|---|---|
| Status | Forthcoming |
| Call | HORIZON-CL6-2027-01 — Call 01 - single stage (2027) |
| Destination | Circular economy and biobased sectors (2026-27) |
| Type of action | Innovation Actions · lump sum |
| Opening | 20 April 2027 |
| Deadline | 22 September 2027 |
| Budget | around EUR 6 million per project · 2 projects expected · EUR 12 million in total |
| TRL at the end | TRL 6–7 |
| Part B page limit | 45 pages (standard application form; check your call) |
| Template | Work Programme 2026–2027 application form |
Expected outcomes
Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Successful proposals under this topic should contribute to the objectives of the EU Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Certification (CRCF) Regulation and the Clean Industrial Deal, allowing industrial operators to use a sustainable carbon source as feedstock. They should facilitate innovators to scale up promising solutions in scope of the Strategy for European Life Sciences and the Biotech…”
- EO1 innovative and improved purification and conversion of gaseous carbon is developed and scaled up to provide feedstock for industrial processes promoting circularity and climate neutrality.
- EO2 advanced industries – applying life sciences technologies and biotechnology - contribute to the climate-neutrality objective.
Expected impacts named in the destination
The wider, long-term effects the destination seeks. Your outcomes feed them; they are not project deliverables.
- EI1 Improved climate change adaptation and mitigation through the transition to a more sustainable and circular economy and bioeconomy, underpinned by biotechnologies and sustainable industrial solutions, such as carbon capture and utilisation and recovery of materials, water and energy.
- EI2 Industrial competitiveness, sustainability and strategic autonomy are improved through the development of safe, sustainable, circular and/or bio-based value chains. This is done by promoting the efficient and circular use of secondary materials and water, fostering the multi-functionality of forests, and ensuring the sustainable supply of critical resources from land and sea.
- EI3 Living conditions for individuals and communities are improved through innovative, affordable and sustainable safe and sustainable by design products and services based on circular and/or bio-based solutions while demonstrating a reduction of environmental and climate pressures.
- EI4 Advanced societal transformation based on a systemic approach, as well as people’s involvement and integration of social sciences and humanities for fair, safe, sustainable and circular value chains, sustainable consumption patterns, environmental justice, gender equality and social inclusion.
What evaluators will look for in this topic
Expected outcomes
- Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
- For each outcome (EO1 to EO2), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
- Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.
What the scope asks for
Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.
- “Increasing industrial productivity and competitiveness should not entail unsustainable exploitation of resources.”
- “Proposals should address the following activities:. review the up-to-date progress of R&I in the use of life sciences-based technologies for Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) phases taking into account the capture of gaseous carbon - from any industrial emission and the atmosphere – and its purification and conversion into products.”
- “In the review of up-to-date progress of R&I as in the first bullet point, international cooperation is encouraged, as well as in the development of innovative technologies and evaluation of their replication potential.”
- “Synergies with activities under Cluster 5 and the Circular Bio-based Europe (CBE) Joint Undertaking are encouraged.”
- “Projects funded under this topic should collaborate, for example within the activities concerning the exploitation of the IP of the developed technologies and at least within the dissemination activities.”
Conditions that shape the proposal
- Part B, sections 1–3: 45 pages (standard application form). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.
- Lump sum: the budget is fixed per work package and paid when each work package is completed. Every work package needs activities and deliverables an evaluator can verify, and the effort must match the money.
- TRL: the topic expects TRL 6–7 by the end of the project. State where you start and the evidence for it.
- Innovation action: evaluators expect a plausible path to commercialisation and named first users or customers.
- Other Eligible Conditions: “In line with the “ restriction on control in innovation actions in critical technology areas ” delineated in General Annex B of the General Annexes, entities established in an eligible country but which are directly or indirectly controlled by China or by a legal entity established in China are not eligible to…”
Impact pathway and traps
- The scope expects pilots or demonstration. Name the sites, the partners who run them and what is measured there.
- International cooperation is part of the scope. Explain what the non-EU partners add and how the cooperation is organised.
- The topic expects cooperation with other projects or initiatives. Reserve effort and budget for it in the work plan.
- Market uptake is part of the scope. Evaluators look for a credible route to market with named first adopters.
- Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
- For each destination impact you claim, show which of your outcomes feeds it. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
- Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
- Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published
Increasing industrial productivity and competitiveness should not entail unsustainable exploitation of resources. This makes the sustainable sourcing of non-virgin-fossil carbon (i.e., carbon from sustainable sourced biomass, gaseous carbon, waste) essential for European industries, especially considering the production of chemicals and materials. Proposals should address the following activities: review the up-to-date progress of R&I in the use of life sciences-based technologies for Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) phases taking into account the capture of gaseous carbon - from any industrial emission and the atmosphere – and its purification and conversion into products. Provide an assessment of their technological readiness, strengths and weaknesses and their potential of carbon storage in products; develop and test innovative and effective life sciences-based technologies, either synthetic biology and/or living microorganisms, to concentrate, purify and convert gaseous carbon efficiently into suitable feedstock to produce products. Products in scope exclude food/feed and biofuels/syngas; perform a preliminary assessment of the environmental impacts, the social and economic viability and business case of the developed technologies, including their scalability and the identification of markets for their output bio-based products; demonstrate one or more technology(ies) among those developed and tested, with the highest environmental, economic and social sustainability; evaluate and disseminate the replication potential of the demonstrated solution(s), including technical and economic/financial recommendations for SMEs and industrial operators in general; assess the feasibility of establishing a spin-off to implement the results from the best technology(ies) demonstration. In the review of up-to-date progress of R&I as in the first bullet point, international cooperation is encouraged, as well as in the development of innovative technologies and evaluation of their replication potential. Synergies with activities under Cluster 5 and the Circular Bio-based Europe (CBE) Joint Undertaking are encouraged. Projects funded under this topic should collaborate, for example within the activities concerning the exploitation of the IP of the developed technologies and at least within the dissemination activities.
Technology readiness, as published
Activities are expected to achieve TRL 6-7 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.
Other topics in HORIZON-CL6-2027-01
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-01 — Integrating Remote Sensing and in-situ observations of Biodiversity, towards a…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-02 — Science-policy support to the implementation of EU and global biodiversity…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-03 — Technical innovation to protect ecosystems and to scale up their restoration
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-04 — Living Labs for the eradication and/or management of invasive alien species
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-05 — Accelerating the transition to a nature positive economy: Integrating…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-06 — Living labs driving transformative change via knowledge integration and…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-07 — Health of ecosystems and wild species, predictions and impacts on human…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-08 — Fostering common farmland birds and mammals for resilient food production…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-BIODIV-09 — Enhancing the competitiveness of organic crop breeding: focus on intercropping…
- HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-CIRCBIO-01 — Enhancing ecodesign and circularity of consumer electronics
Source and attribution
Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.