GrantWise
HORIZON EUROPE TOPIC · Cluster 5 · Climate, Energy and Mobility

De-risking renewable fuel technologies through transnational pre-commercial procurement of renewable fuel industrial value chains

HORIZON-CL5-2026-11-D3-04 — the expected outcomes as checkable statements, what evaluators look for in this topic, and the conditions that shape the proposal.

OpenPCPDeadline 1 December 2026around EUR 40 million per project

GrantWise › Horizon Europe topics › HORIZON-CL5-2026-11-D3-04

TopicHORIZON-CL5-2026-11-D3-04
StatusOpen
CallHORIZON-CL5-2026-11 — ENERGY
DestinationEnsuring more efficient, sustainable, secure, and competitive renewable and decarbonised energy supply (2026-27)
Type of actionPre-commercial Procurement
Opening4 August 2026
Deadline1 December 2026
Budgetaround EUR 40 million per project · 1 project expected · EUR 40 million in total
Part B page limit60 pages (topic conditions; check your call)
TemplateWork Programme 2026–2027 application form

Expected outcomes

Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes. The topic says: “Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:”

  1. EO1 Public authorities, industry, technology providers, energy producers and consumers profit from de-risking of cost-effective essential value chains of those renewable fuel technologies that can contribute to domestic commercial fuel production beyond 2030 customized to their needs, from improved access to better financing exploiting synergies across funding schemes, and from more effective market uptake, business models, increased competitiveness, and commercialization opportunities.
  2. EO2 Energy producers, clean tech manufacturing industries, researchers and consumers benefit from improved performance, lower environmental impact, security and competitiveness of ad-hoc renewable fuel technologies compared to existing ones, as well as new market opportunities.
  3. EO3 Community, public authorities and industry benefit from sharing the de-risking cost and reducing it by engaging several competing solution suppliers/technology providers in parallel, boosting transnational public and private investments in de-risking and attracting new players to tackle supplier lock-in issues.
  4. EO4 The implementation of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET Plan) Action of Renewable Fuels and Bioenergy is supported and facilitated by better alignment of public and private R&I priorities and of funding mechanisms.
  5. EO5 Policy makers and regulators are provided with evidence to accelerate permitting procedures and increase the public acceptance of innovative and sustainable renewable fuel projects improving the regulatory framework.

Expected impacts named in the destination

The wider, long-term effects the destination seeks. Your outcomes feed them; they are not project deliverables.

  1. EI1 Energy producers have access to efficient and competitive European renewable energy and renewable fuel technologies with a solid knowledge base and are able to deploy them to enhance the EU’s energy security and reach its climate neutrality objectives, in a sustainable way in environmental (e.g., biodiversity, multiple uses of land and water, natural resources, pollution) and socioeconomic terms, and in line with the Sustainable Development Goals.
  2. EI2 Technology providers have access to European, competitive, resilient, reliable, sustainable, and affordable value chains of renewable energy and renewable fuel technologies including emerging ones, and with strong export potential to supply both the EU internal and global markets. They benefit also from circular renewable energy technologies that are safe and sustainable by design with reduced and diversified external dependence on critical raw materials.
  3. EI3 Economic sectors benefit from better integration of renewable energy and renewable fuel-based solutions that are, among others, competitive, cost-effective, efficient, flexible, reliable, and sustainable. Such integration is facilitated through digitalisation and integration of artificial intelligence of renewable energy technologies that provide network stability and reliability.
  4. EI4 European industries benefit from a reinforced export potential of renewable energy and renewable fuel technologies, also through international partnerships, and become more competitive in innovative renewable energy technologies in Europe and globally.
  5. EI5 European researchers benefit from a stronger community and from a reinforced scientific basis on renewable energy and renewable fuel technologies including emerging ones, also through international collaborations.
  6. EI6 European citizens have access to an energy market that is fair and equitable, more resilient, uses all different types of local renewable energy resources, and is less dependent on fossil fuels imports. Citizens experience less fuel and energy poverty, and also benefit from new employment and upskilling opportunities. Local communities benefit from a more decentralized, affordable, and secure energy system and from multiple uses of land and water.
  7. EI7 R&I actions will support the just digital and green transformation of the energy system through advanced solutions for accelerating the energy systems integration and decarbonisation. The developed clean, sustainable solutions will contribute to making the energy system work better for actors and supply more reliable, resilient and secure energy – even under increasingly more frequent extreme climate events.
  8. EI8 The solutions developed will contribute to increase flexibility and grid hosting capacity for renewables through optimizing cross sector integration and grid scale storage as well as cover off-grid situations. They will improve the preparedness of the electricity system to support the EU's binding target for 2030 of minimum of 42.5% renewables in the gross final energy consumption (with the aspiration to reach 45%), and full decarbonisation by 2050. They will enable further electrification of demand and will enhance the competitiveness of the European value chain, reduce pressure on resources (also by making technologies ‘circular by design’) and decrease dependencies. Such solutions would…
  9. EI9 The solutions will improve consumer awareness and engagement in the energy transition, via innovative offers and services (e.g. demand response, energy communities) and will target different types of consumers, including “hard to reach” population groups (such as energy poor or low-income households). This will result in increased trust in, and uptake of the new products and services entering the energy system.
  10. EI10 Accelerated deployment of carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS) as a CO2 emission mitigation option in electricity generation and/or in industry applications, as well as carbon dioxide removal for negative emissions.

What evaluators will look for in this topic

Expected outcomes

  • Projects should contribute to all of the expected outcomes.
  • For each outcome (EO1 to EO5), name who will use or adopt your results (a specific group, not “industry” or “society”), how they get them, and the indicator that shows the change, with baseline, target and date.
  • Use the topic's own words for each outcome, so the evaluator can tick it off.

What the scope asks for

Evaluators check the proposal against these sentences of the scope. Answer each one visibly, in the call's own words.

  • “Proposals should steer the development of these technologies at EU level and bring them to the market.”
  • “The competitive development in phases of entire industrial value chains should built upon existing knowledge on technology and value chain readiness based on existing EU projects and studies, thus speeding up the de-risking. ‘Transnational buyers’ could be public plus possibly one or more private procurers, and that provide similar services of public interest.”
  • “The procurement must be open to providers of R&D services established in any EU Member States and Associated Countries.”
  • “Inclusiveness of a broad range of public and private procures across EU and Associated Countries and across national borders is encouraged, to effectively share the risk and benefit from creating in the EU market readiness of industrial value chains of essential renewable fuel technologies.”
  • “The consortium is encouraged to plan activities during the project to raise awareness to the R&D providers that will win PCP contracts about unlocking and increasing their investment capacity in the field of renewable fuel technologies, for example by using possible combinations of the PCP procurement contract with additional support for companies from the EIC, InvestEU, regional funds or possibly other sources of Union funding.”
  • “Participation of public contracting authorities and entities managing or funding such funds in the project is encouraged.”
  • “In addition, the procurers should include in the proposal what will be their planned approach for deployment in case the PCP results in successful solutions; this could be through a combination of deploying a limited set of solutions already during the PCP project and/or foreseeing a deliverable that prepares follow-up procurement to purchase (larger volumes of) such type of solution(s) after the PCP.”
  • “Essential value chains to de-risk should be based on identified technologies by our studies (i) – vii) below) as those that can contribute essentially to domestic commercial fuel production beyond 2030, and possibly other that can be demonstrated at commercial scale by the end of the execution phase of the project:.”
  • “Industrial value chains of the essential renewable fuel technologies should be developed based on domestic sustainable feedstocks across EU and Associated Countries and on also creating synergies across all end use energy and transport sectors for markets and production facilities for renewable fuels.”
  • “All hydrogen used to the production of the synthetic fuels should comply with the EU legislation on the renewable and low carbon methodology, i.e. the processes of Steam Methane Reforming using fossil fuels for the production are out of the scope, as there is no RI associated to these methods.”

Conditions that shape the proposal

  • Part B, sections 1–3: 60 pages (topic conditions). Text beyond the limit is not read; tables and figures count.

Impact pathway and traps

  • The scope expects pilots or demonstration. Name the sites, the partners who run them and what is measured there.
  • Market uptake is part of the scope. Evaluators look for a credible route to market with named first adopters.
  • Policy or regulation is in scope. Name the policy owners you will reach and what you will give them.
  • Keep outputs, outcomes and impacts apart: what you deliver, what changes when others use it, and the long-term effect.
  • For each destination impact you claim, show which of your outcomes feeds it. Destination impacts are long-term effects, not project deliverables.
  • Name the barriers outside the project (regulation, markets, user behaviour) that could block uptake, and what you will do if they do.
  • Section 2.3 (the summary canvas) is optional on this call; the old split into scientific, economic and societal impact is no longer required.
The scope, as published

An exceptional effort is needed to develop, demonstrate and de-risk essential renewable fuels technologies and establish their industrial value chains in a cost-effective way to cover the EU needs where renewable fuels are the main long-term solution. Proposals should steer the development of these technologies at EU level and bring them to the market. Pre-commercial procurement of R&D, validation and possibly, first deployment of industrial value chains of essential renewable fuel technologies is considered an effective tool to de-risk such activities and overcome the “valley of death” because real take off by engaging primarily concerned contracting entities is expected. The scope of this action is to design and bring industrial value chains of essential renewable fuel technologies at TRL 8 by the action end. The competitive development in phases of entire industrial value chains should built upon existing knowledge on technology and value chain readiness based on existing EU projects and studies, thus speeding up the de-risking. ‘Transnational buyers’ could be public plus possibly one or more private procurers, and that provide similar services of public interest. The buyers will collectively develop and implement the pre-commercial procurement of R&D services from a number of providers and designate a lead procurer to award the contracts. The procurement must be open to providers of R&D services established in any EU Member States and Associated Countries. Inclusiveness of a broad range of public and private procures across EU and Associated Countries and across national borders is encouraged, to effectively share the risk and benefit from creating in the EU market readiness of industrial value chains of essential renewable fuel technologies. Public and private EU airport and port authorities and their respective managing bodies, aircraft operators and shipping companies, other state, regional or local authorities and bodies governed by public law or their associations, are some examples of expected public and private procurers with an incentive to improve solutions in areas of public interest, such as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from energy supply as fuels. The consortium is encouraged to plan activities during the project to raise awareness to the R&D providers that will win PCP contracts about unlocking and increasing their investment capacity in the field of renewable fuel technologies, for example by using possible combinations of the PCP procurement contract with additional support for companies from the EIC, InvestEU, regional funds or possibly other sources of Union funding. Participation of public contracting authorities and entities managing or funding such funds in the project is encouraged. In addition, the procurers should include in the proposal what will be their planned approach for deployment in case the PCP results in successful solutions; this could be through a combination of deploying a limited set of solutions already during the PCP project and/or foreseeing a deliverable that prepares follow-up procurement to purchase (larger volumes of) such type of solution(s) after the PCP. Essential value chains to de-risk should be based on identified technologies by our studies (i) – vii) below) as those that can contribute essentially to domestic commercial fuel production beyond 2030, and possibly other that can be demonstrated at commercial scale by the end of the execution phase of the project: Production of advanced bioEthanol and further processing into ATJ-SPK Biomass Gasification and FT-Synthesis to produce FT-SPK Production of BioMethanol for further processing into MTJ Hydrotreatment of Lipids from marginal/contaminated lands to produce HEFA Biomass Pyrolysis and Upgrading or co-processing to produce biokerosene and bio-heavy fuel oil Biomethane from AD and Gasification and Methanation to produce biomethane for shipping or further processing into methanol (methanolysis) for shipping E-Methanol production from CO2 and renewable H2 for shipping Industrial value chains of the essential renewable fuel technologies should be developed based on domestic sustainable feedstocks across EU and Associated Countries and on also creating synergies across all end use energy and transport sectors for markets and production facilities for renewable fuels. Hydrogen production as end-product is not in scope. Public contracting authorities and entities as defined in REGULATION (EU) 2021/695, Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU a) Study on Development of Outlook for the Necessary Means to Build Industrial Capacity for Drop-in Advanced Biofuels - European Commission, b) How To Mobilize Industrial Capacity Building For Advanced Biofuels All hydrogen used to the production of the synthetic fuels should comply with the EU legislation on the renewable and low carbon methodology, i.e. the processes of Steam Methane Reforming using fossil fuels for the production are out of the scope, as there is no RI associated to these methods.

Other topics in HORIZON-CL5-2026-11

Source and attribution

Topic text from the official topic page on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, retrieved 19 October 2026. © European Union, reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (CC BY 4.0). Changes: the expected outcomes and impacts are split into numbered statements, long passages are shortened, and the evaluator checklist is GrantWise's own commentary. Your call and the Work Programme always win; check them before you submit. GrantWise is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission.